The Voice on the Line
My manager had printed the email headers, but the first thing the security analyst asked was whether I had shared my password.
“No,” I said. “I changed it. I ended the other sessions. The account page showed only my phone.”
The analyst glanced at the paper. “That confirms what was signed in when you checked. It doesn’t tell us who used the relay.”
“I know.” I kept my hands on the table. The urge to explain the difference between an authenticated session and a message routed through a third-party service had already made my throat tight. “The headers show the relay. My account security page shows no other session. Those are two separate facts.”
My manager sat opposite me, with the printed message between us. She had not brought a lawyer or a second manager. That was something, though I didn’t know what it meant yet.
The analyst turned his laptop toward her. “We can’t verify the sender from this. The mail passed through a service outside our systems. We also can’t confirm that the message came from Oren’s logged-in account.”
My manager looked at me. “Did you write it?”
“No.”
“Did you authorize anyone to send it?”
“No.”
She nodded once and wrote something on her copy. I watched the pen move. I wanted the wording to matter. I wanted a line that would survive the meeting, the client call, and anyone later deciding which version of me was more convenient.
“Can you record that as disputed authorship?” I asked.
The analyst said, “I can record that you deny sending or authorizing it, and that we can’t attribute it to a verified session.”
“Do that.”
He typed. My manager didn’t interrupt him.
The attachment was still open on her laptop. A table I’d made from a working file, the same one the message had presented as a basis for a delivery date. I asked to see it again. The analyst watched me scroll through the rows, then placed the laptop in front of me.
The numbers looked familiar in the way a half-finished task looks familiar when it has been pulled out of context. I found the part I needed: a column heading that had changed in the current version, and a formula that still pointed to the old worksheet. It was an intermediate table. The totals weren’t reliable.
“This can’t go to the client as a reviewed result,” I said. “The formula is pulling from the old assumptions. I changed that last week.”
“Can you show me the corrected file?” my manager asked.
Next
Will Oren be able to stop the client from accepting the Replica’s version of the table and the deadline as his?